FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [November 2004 Threads] Miro Samek Quantum Frame Wrk & freeRTOSPosted by Nobody/Anonymous on November 30, 2004 Has any one ported Quantum frame works (QF)on top of freeRTOS. If so please share your experience. Mr Barry if you are aware of the above please share your thoughts.
RE: Miro Samek Quantum Frame Wrk & freeRTOSPosted by Richard on November 30, 2004 I have used QP on a big R&D project - it used a commercial RTOS not FreeRTOS but the principals are the same and it does not rely on any particular feature of an RTOS.
From my own experience I would strongly recommend QP for any application with a state machine of moderate complexity or greater be it with or without an RTOS.
At first using pointers to functions that return pointers to functions is difficult to get your head around, as is the fact that a state is represented by a function (not the traditional approach) - but you don't really need to even think about this. The abstraction is such that the complexity is hidden.
Personally I did not like the macro usage and syntax used in the book so we changed it to suit ourselves, but the basic principal was the same and worked very well.
This was some time ago now so the detail details are a bit shady but hope this helps you decide.
Regards.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|